Dana 60 ground clearance and weight vs 9"
Moderator: Club Officers
- VerticalTRX
- Club President
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:51 pm
- Location: Southwest VA
- Contact:
Dana 60 ground clearance and weight vs 9"
I've been looking into options for a different rear axle setup and I'm considering a D60. While I love my 9", it's just not holding up. I've either bent or twisted 3 different shafts, broken the cross-pin, cracked the carrier, and now I think the housing is bent(can't keep axle seals in it.)
So, I'm thinking about going with a rear D60 out of a '78-79 F-250. The things I'm concerned about is the loss of ground clearance and weight. Does anyone know the axle center line to bottom dimension on a D60? Also looking for the weight of a rear D60.
If I don't go with a full-float axle I'm going to have to get a new heavy duty 9" housing, 35sp shafts and full spool, which would cost nearly $1000.
Any info would be great.
So, I'm thinking about going with a rear D60 out of a '78-79 F-250. The things I'm concerned about is the loss of ground clearance and weight. Does anyone know the axle center line to bottom dimension on a D60? Also looking for the weight of a rear D60.
If I don't go with a full-float axle I'm going to have to get a new heavy duty 9" housing, 35sp shafts and full spool, which would cost nearly $1000.
Any info would be great.
'79 F-150
'49 CJ-3A
'49 CJ-3A
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
hey matt, I dont know any dimensions off the top of my head but a 60 with a spool is alot cheaper than a $1000 9 in. I think the cost savings and added strength that you would get you far outweigh the loss of an inch or so of ground clearance...
Edit: I think with the engine in your truck weight isnt a huge issue either. I guess it all boils down to more money to equalize strength and minimize weight or saving $700 dollars and essentially adding the weight of driving with a passenger all of the time. (9 in= 200lbs. while a Dana 60 with discs is prob around 400lbs.)
Edit: I think with the engine in your truck weight isnt a huge issue either. I guess it all boils down to more money to equalize strength and minimize weight or saving $700 dollars and essentially adding the weight of driving with a passenger all of the time. (9 in= 200lbs. while a Dana 60 with discs is prob around 400lbs.)
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
But he's not going to go over 36" tall tires and a 14bolt is just a land anchor on anything less than 40's.BadAssEddie wrote:yeah thats the end all be all in OEM rear axle strength but thats the worse end of the spectrum for both weight and ground clearance.jac6695 wrote:GM 14 bolt/thread.
Terry
Offroading: The hobby of turning perfectly good vehicles into scrap metal.
Offroading: The hobby of turning perfectly good vehicles into scrap metal.
- willhf1011
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:14 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD/Blacksburg
If you ditch the drums on a 60 and go with discs, it will drop like 50-60 pounds I would guess. Ready to go, with drums, I'd put a 60 between 400-500 lbs ground clearance isn't great but it can be shaved.
I agree on the 14 bolt. it can be shaved to almost the clearance of a 44 depending on how far you want to go (so can the 60) and is absurdly strong in stock form.
I agree on the 14 bolt. it can be shaved to almost the clearance of a 44 depending on how far you want to go (so can the 60) and is absurdly strong in stock form.
93 YJ Under Construction
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
Thats what im saying.TerryD wrote:But he's not going to go over 36" tall tires and a 14bolt is just a land anchor on anything less than 40's.BadAssEddie wrote:yeah thats the end all be all in OEM rear axle strength but thats the worse end of the spectrum for both weight and ground clearance.jac6695 wrote:GM 14 bolt/thread.
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
is the loss in an inch of ground clearance going to a 60 worth all the work involved with shaving a 14 bolt plus the added strength he doesnt need? the 60 is so appealing because of its bolt in ability with low cost and added strength over the 9in. These overwhelm any loss in clearnce in my opinion...willhf1011 wrote:If you ditch the drums on a 60 and go with discs, it will drop like 50-60 pounds I would guess. Ready to go, with drums, I'd put a 60 between 400-500 lbs ground clearance isn't great but it can be shaved.
I agree on the 14 bolt. it can be shaved to almost the clearance of a 44 depending on how far you want to go (so can the 60) and is absurdly strong in stock form.
You can also gain an easy inch on the sixty by just grinding down the bottom lip to make it smooth so you'll slide on it instead of getting hung up.
-Zach
2003 Ford F150 work truck piece of crap- sold
1998 Dodge Ram, 35s, 456s- sold
2000 Powerstroke tow rig on DUBs- once rolled- sold
2004 Dodge Ram Hemi tow rig
1995 YJ on BLOCKS
2003 Ford F150 work truck piece of crap- sold
1998 Dodge Ram, 35s, 456s- sold
2000 Powerstroke tow rig on DUBs- once rolled- sold
2004 Dodge Ram Hemi tow rig
1995 YJ on BLOCKS
- willhf1011
- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:14 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD/Blacksburg
The difference in clearance between the 14 bolt and 60 is marginal and to shave the 14 to equal clearance would require no more work than just cutting the bottom lip. I think either would work well in his application, the only difference being that the 14 bolt will be substantially stronger, easier to regear, option for pinion guard, etc
93 YJ Under Construction
Yes, I do know the 14 bolt is an anchor with that nasty bottom lip. Shave it a bit, and don't be afraid to drag it across. It won't break. As mentioned, a 12 year old with one eye can successfully regear a 14 bolt in about 2 hours with a pair of vise grips, and gears and a Detroit locker can picked up at Sheetz very cheap.
James C.
97 K2500HD 6.5/4L80E/NP241/9.5/14BFF
86'ish S10 Blazer LT1/4L60E/ORD Doubler/D60/14BFF
97 K2500HD 6.5/4L80E/NP241/9.5/14BFF
86'ish S10 Blazer LT1/4L60E/ORD Doubler/D60/14BFF
- VerticalTRX
- Club President
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:51 pm
- Location: Southwest VA
- Contact:
Thanks for all the replies. Right now I'm only considering a D60 or building a new 9". A 14-bolt is just way more axle than I need. I had a free 10.25 that I could have used, but didn't due to it's size. I have no problem re-gearing dana axles, so that's not an issue either. I can pick up a good D60 for about $200, but it would also mean new 8-lug hubs, etc on the front end, and new wheels and tires (16" 8-lug rims, which I do have.)
My ultimate solution would be a full-float 35 spline 9", but that's getting into big $$$.
Anyways, I'm mostly just looking for some numbers on ground clearance of a D 60 housing vs a 9" housing, stock for stock. Weight is also a big concern, I've worked really hard to keep this truck as light as possible, so 100-200lbs more would be too much. It's mostly the full-float that I'm after, ring-gear and axle shaft strength shouldn't be an issue. Keep the info coming.
My ultimate solution would be a full-float 35 spline 9", but that's getting into big $$$.
Anyways, I'm mostly just looking for some numbers on ground clearance of a D 60 housing vs a 9" housing, stock for stock. Weight is also a big concern, I've worked really hard to keep this truck as light as possible, so 100-200lbs more would be too much. It's mostly the full-float that I'm after, ring-gear and axle shaft strength shouldn't be an issue. Keep the info coming.
'79 F-150
'49 CJ-3A
'49 CJ-3A
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
- BadAssEddie
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:12 pm
- Location: The Woods
- VerticalTRX
- Club President
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 12:51 pm
- Location: Southwest VA
- Contact:
Well I guess I'll build the 9".
Does anyone trust Yukon shafts? I have heard lots of bad stuff about them, but they are only $345.00 for a set of 35sp 9" shafts, vs $450 for Mosers. I know the Mosers will be good, but if the yukons will hold up I would rather save some coin. Thoughts?
Does anyone trust Yukon shafts? I have heard lots of bad stuff about them, but they are only $345.00 for a set of 35sp 9" shafts, vs $450 for Mosers. I know the Mosers will be good, but if the yukons will hold up I would rather save some coin. Thoughts?
'79 F-150
'49 CJ-3A
'49 CJ-3A